Capabilities in the Area of Flexible Activities and Market Competitiveness – the Perspective of Silesian Enterprises
Abstract
Theoretical background: The business environment is a range of conditions and determinants that shape the functioning of enterprises on the market. Hence, the ability of enterprises to flexible behavior or actions in the area of the organization's functioning becomes important. The idea of flexibility of action in the process of managing enterprises consists in such actions, thanks to which the organization can easily and quickly adapt to changes taking place in its business environment. It can be indicated that dynamic capabilities are specific capabilities of key importance, including organizational resources, which ensure achieving competitive advantage in the changing and turbulent business environment of the enterprise. Flexibility is therefore a property that allows the organization to cope with changes in the environment, which is why a feature such as flexibility is desirable by every enterprise regardless of its size and business profile. An enterprise characterized by the capability to take flexible actions is open to all changes, and proper management of these changes is necessary not only to gain a competitive advantage. Achieving competitive advantage requires constant change, adaptation, and flexibility, which is reflected in the level of capability to take flexible actions in the areas of the organization's functioning.
Purpose of the article: The aim of the article is to identify the capabilities in the area of flexible organizational activities that influence the growth of the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises.
Research methods: The inference is based on the results of our own study on a group of 141 small and medium-sized Silesian manufacturing enterprises. The proper study was conducted in 2022 and was preceded by a pilot study. During the study, a research tool was used, i.e., an original survey questionnaire. The survey questionnaire was subjected to a reliability assessment. After formal assessment, the collected data was subjected to statistical analysis, including the use of descriptive statistics and nonparametric statistics.
Main findings: The results of the study showed that the declared level of capability to activities flexibly in the surveyed companies was not high in general, at 3.84 on a 5-point scale. The highest level of capability to activities flexibly was declared by the surveyed companies in the operational area. The lowest level of capability to activities flexibly was indicated by companies in the financial area. It turns out that the level of the studied capability to activities flexibly increased significantly after the COVID-19 pandemic. The study showed that as many as 82% of respondents stated that before the pandemic the level of the studied capability was rather or definitely lower. It turned out that nearly 69% of Silesian small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises know their company's market competition well or very well. The results of the study showed that surveyed enterprises assess their level of market competitiveness, on a 5-point scale, at a level of only 3.35 in relation to enterprises competing with them, which is quite low and does not differ significantly in groups of enterprises due to their size. The results of the analysis indicated that there is a statistically significant positive relationship between the capability to perform flexible actions in general and the level of market competitiveness. The analysis of the correlation of variables, using the Kendall's tau statistic, also showed that there is a statistically significant positive relationship between all the distinguished areas of flexibility of enterprises' actions and the level of their competitiveness. In all cases, this relationship is weak but, as should be pointed out, statistically significant. The highest value of the Kendall-Tau index occurs in the case of operational flexibility and the lowest, interestingly, in the case of technological flexibility and market competitiveness.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anning-Dorson, T. (2021). Organizational culture and leadership as antecedents to organizational: Implications for SME competitiveness. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(5), 1309–1325.
Babbie, E. (2004). Badania społeczne w praktyce. Wyd. Nauk. PWN.
Bereżnicka, J. (2024). Sources of financial flexibility and investment activity in family farms in Poland. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska – sectio H, 58(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17951/h.2024.58.1.7-22
Bhupendra, K.V., & Sangle, S. (2022). Structural process model of absorptive capacity for stakeholder’s integration in decision-making: Dynamic capability perspective. Society and Business Review, 17(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-05-2021-0067
Brettel, M., Mauer, R., & Engelen, A. (2012). Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001
Brown, P., Ly, T., Pham, H., & Sivabalan, P. (2020). Automation and management control in dynamic environments: Managing organisational flexibility and energy efficiency in service sectors. The British Accounting Review, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100840
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2022). Impact of organizational dynamic capability on international expansion and the moderating role of environmental dynamism. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(5), 1935–1956. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-10-2021-3003
Dai, J., Chan, H.K. & Yee, R.W.Y. (2018). Examining moderating effect of organizational culture on the relationship between market pressure and corporate environmental strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 74, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.05.003
De Toni, A., & Tonchia, S. (2005). Definitions and linkages between operational and strategic flexibilities. Omega, 33(6), 525–540.
Eapen, G. (2009). Flexible Companies for the Uncertain World. CRC Press,.
Farida, I., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Business strategies and competitive advantage: The role of performance and innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030163
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. Routledge.
Górecki, T. (2011). Podstawy statystyki z przykładami w R. Wyd. BTC.
Hair, J., Black, W.C., Babin, B.B., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2009). Análise Multivariada de Dados. Bookman.
Harrald, J.R. (2006). Agility and discipline: Critical success factors for disaster response. The Annals of the American Academy, 604(1), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205285404
Jagoda, A. (2015). Elastyczność funkcjonalna jako czynnik przewagi konkurencyjnej małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw. In J. Witkowski & A. Skowrońska (Eds.), Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 382 (pp. 316–323). Wyd. UE we Wrocławiu.
Jain, N.K., Panda, A., & Choudhary, P. (2020). Institutional pressures and circular economy performance: the role of environmental management system and organizational flexibility in oil and gas sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3509–3525. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2593
Jaworski, B.J., & Kohli A.K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53–70.
Joseph Jerome, J.J., Saxena, D., Sonwaney, V., & Foropon, C. (2022a). Procurement 4.0 to the rescue: Catalysing its adoption by modelling the challenges. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 29(1), 217–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-01-2021-0030
Joseph Jerome, J.J., Sonwaney, V., & Arunkumar, O.N. (2022b). Modelling the factors affecting organizational flexibility in MSMEs. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 17(3), 596–625.https://doi.org/10.1108/jgoss-06-2022-0075
Lyu, Ch., Zhang, F., Ji, J., Teo, T.S.H., Wang, T., & Liu, Z. (2022). Competitive intensity and new product development outcomes: The roles of knowledge integration and organizational unlearning. Journal of Business Research, 139, 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.049
Kalyani, M., & Prakashan Sahoo, M. (2011). Human resource strategy: A tool of managing change for organizational excellence. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(8), 280–286. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n8p280
Kasiewicz, S. (2009). Elastyczność przedsiębiorstwa w koncepcjach zarządzania zasobowego. In S. Kasiewicz, J. Ormińska, W. Rogowski, & W. Urban (Eds.), Metody osiągania elastyczności przedsiębiorstw (pp. 11–55). Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
Khin, S., Ahmad, N.H., & Ramayah, T. (2012). The integrated effect of strategic orientations on product innovativeness: Moderating role of strategic flexibility. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 743–748.
Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2020). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. McKinsey & Company.
Komisja Europejska. (2023). European Innovation Scoreboard 2023. Urząd Publikacji Unii Europejskiej. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/119961
Krupski, R. (2008). Elastyczność organizacji. Wyd. UE we Wrocławiu.
Kwiecień, A. (2018). Elastyczność funkcjonowania podmiotów gospodarczych a sukces i kreacja wartości przedsiębiorstwa. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 377, 52–65.
Lahiri, S., Mukherjee, D., & Peng, M.W. (2020). Behind the internationalization of family SMEs: A strategy tripod synthesis. Global Strategy Journal, 10(4), 813–838. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1376
Liu, Ch., Yang, J., Zhang, F., Teo, T.S.H., & Guo, W. (2020). Antecedents and consequence of organizational unlearning: Evidence from China. Industrial Marketing Management, 84, 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.07.013
Lyu, C., Zhang, F., Ji, J., Teo, T.S.H, Wang, T., & Liu, Z. (2022). Competitive intensity and new product development outcomes: The roles of knowledge integration and organizational unlearning. Journal of Business Research, 139(C), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.049
Malca, O., Bolaños, J.P., Acedo, F.J., Rubio Donet, J.L., & Peña-Vinces, J. (2021). Relational flexibility norms and relationship-building capabilities as a mediating mechanism in export performance: Insights from exporting SMEs in an emerging economy, Peru. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(8), 1745–1768. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-09-2019-0735
Maroufkhani, P., Tseng, M.-L., Iranmanesh, M., Ismail, W.K.W., & Khalid, H. (2020). Big data analytics adoption: Determinants and performances among small to medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102190
Morgan, T., Anokhin, S.A., Song, Ch., & Chistyakova, N. (2019). The role of customer participation in building new product development speed capabilities in turbulent environments. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(1), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0549-9
Moroz, M. (2013). Kształtowanie elastyczności przedsiębiorstw internetowych. Wyd. UE we Wrocławiu.
Nagaraj, V., Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., & Gaskin, J. (2020). Team design thinking, product innovativeness, and the moderating role of problem unfamiliarity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12528
Narver, J.C., & Slater, S.F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. The Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 20–35.
Osbert-Pociecha, G. (2004). Dualna natura elastyczności organizacji i jej implikacje praktyczne. Przegląd Organizacji, 9, 9–12.
Osbert-Pociecha, G., Moroz, M., & Lichtarski, J. (2008). Elastyczność przedsiębiorstwa jako konfiguracja elastyczności cząstkowych. Gospodarka Narodowa, 4, 59–84.
Pakulska, T. (2020). Elastyczność w biznesie. Skuteczna adaptacja. Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
Peng, X.B., Liu, Y.L., & Lin, Y. (2015). The impact of environment uncertainty and effectual flexibility on entrepreneurial resource combination: The moderating effect of entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 9(4), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.3868/s070-004-015-0022-9
Sharma, M.K., Sushil, & Jain, P.K. (2010). Revisiting flexibility in organizations: Exploring its impact on performance. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 11(3), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396587
Sheng, S., Zhou, K.Z., & Li, J.J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.75
Taber, K.S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
van der Weerdt, N.P. (2009). Organizational flexibility for hypercompetitive markets. Empirical evidence of the composition and context specificity of dynamic capabilities and organization design parameters. ERIM Ph.D. Series Research in Management, Erasmus Research Institute of Management. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/16182
Verdú, A.J., & Gómez-Gras, J.-M. (2009). Measuring the organizational responsiveness through managerial flexibility. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(6), 668–690. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810910997069
Weaven, S., Quach, S., Thaichon, P., Frazer, L., Billot, K., & Grace, D. (2021). Surviving an economic downturn: Dynamic capabilities of SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 128, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.009
Wilcox, R.R. (1992). Robust generalizations of classical test reliability and Cronbach’s alpha. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 239–254.
Wysocki, F., & Lira, J. (2005). Statystyka opisowa. Wyd. Akademii Rolniczej im. A. Cieszkowskiego w Poznaniu.
Yeniaras, V., Di Benedetto, A. & Dayan, M. (2021). Effects of relational ties paradox on financial and non-financial consequences of servitization: Roles of organizational flexibility and improvisation. Industrial Marketing Management, 99, 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.09.006
Yu, K., Cadeaux, J., & Luo, B.N. (2015). Operational flexibility: Review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 169(C), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.035
Zhao, Y., & Wang, X. (2020). Organisational unlearning, relearning and strategic flexibility: From the perspective of updating routines and knowledge. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(2), 1251–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1758656
Zhou, K.S., & Wu, F. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.830
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2025.59.4.47-61
Date of publication: 2025-12-16 14:34:53
Date of submission: 2024-10-20 19:41:12
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Anna Lemańska-Majdzik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.