The confluence of local property tax policy and central personal income tax policy

Monika Banaszewska, Michał Bernardelli, Paweł Felis, Marta Kluzek, Elżbieta Malinowska-Misiąg, Edyta Małecka-Ziembińska, Artur Walasik

Abstract


Theoretical background: In public economics, there is well-established research on the fiscal efficiency of local tax sources (fiscal capacity) and the sensitivity of local authorities’ tax revenues to changes in the parameters of their local tax policy (fiscal stress). However, there is a need for a critical approach to these characteristics in the conditions of the division of tax authority between central and local authorities, in particular regarding the application of a hybrid model combining the shares of local authorities in taxes that are the subject of central tax policy (personal income tax) and local tax authority over property taxation.

Purpose of the article: There are no indicators for identifying the relationship between changes in personal income taxation policy and local property taxation policy. Therefore, the theoretical goal of the article is to develop indicators for determining the willingness and ability of local authorities to compensate for the undesirable fiscal effects of the personal income taxation policy pursued by the central authorities. The research goal of the article is to evaluate the differentiation of these indicators in municipalities in Poland.

Research methods: Drawing conclusions based on the estimated basic parameters of statistics of the developed pressure and capability indicators for the population of Polish municipalities; distinguishing the subpopulations of urban municipalities, urban-rural municipalities, rural municipalities, and cities with county rights, both in the temporal and spatial dimension.

Main findings: The paper’s conceptual framework enables a critical adaptation of the fiscal stress and fiscal capacity research methods to analyse the confluence of unfavourable changes in the conducted by central government personal income taxation policy and the property taxation policy controlled by local tax authorities. The proposed pressure to compensate and ability to compensate indicators were estimated for all Polish municipalities in the years 2019–2023. On their basis, their statistics were developed, allowing for the formulation of the following conclusions. The median of the index of pressure to compensate, that is the ratio of shares in personal income tax to current expenditures subtracted by earmarked grants was stable in the years 2019–2022 despite numerous and profound shocks to municipal budgets triggered both by taxation reforms and exogenous events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine. The year 2023 saw a significant drop in exposure to unfavourable changes in personal income taxation. The decreased variation accompanied a decrease in the indicator in question. On the other hand, the median index of the ability to compensate for unfavourable changes in personal income taxation provided by central government, that is the median of relations between tax expenditures and revenues from property taxes, was very stable from 2019 to 2023. The activity of the local authorities in pursuit of tax policy did not exceed 20%, which can be assessed as a stable but low level of compensation capacity. The empirics show that the pressure-to-compensate indicator establishes noteworthy variances among municipalities depending on their type. The higher the level of urbanization, the higher the values of this indicator, as local revenues from personal income taxation in urbanized regions are usually higher. This presentation of results and comparison of the size of these indicators spatially make it possible to identify regions that may need special attention from policymakers when planning future tax reforms.


Keywords


local tax policy; incidence of personal income tax; pressure to tax; tax capacity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. (1962). Measures of state and local fiscal capacity and tax effort (Report M-16). Washington, DC.

Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. (1971). Measuring the fiscal capacity and effort of state and local areas (Report M-58). Washington, DC.

Allers, M.A., & Ishemoi, L.J. (2010). Fiscal capacity equalisation in Tanzania. Local Government Studies, 36(5), 697–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2010.506981

Brien, S.T., Eger III, R.J., & Matkin, D.S.T. (2021). The timing of managerial responses to fiscal stress. Public Administration Review, 81(3), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13359

Bahl, R. (1972). A representative tax system approach to measuring tax effort in developing countries. IMF Staff Papers. https://doi.org/10.5089/9281241956337.024.A003

Chervin, S. (2007). Fiscal effort, fiscal capacity, and fiscal need: Separate concepts, separate problems. Fiscal Flexibility, 3. Tennessee Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.

Commission on Local Government Commonwealth of Virginia. (2023). Report on comparative revenue capacity, revenue effort, and fiscal stress of Virginia’s cities and counties. FY 2021. Richmond, VA.

Felis, P., & Gołębiowski, G. (2021). Tax expenditures in local taxes – an effective instrument of local tax policy? The example of Poland. Contemporary Economics, 15(4), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.456

Garg, S., Goyal, A., & Pal, R. (2017). Why tax effort falls short of tax capacity in Indian States: A stochastic frontier approach. Public Finance Review, 45(2), 232–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142115623855

Hite, J., & Ulbrich, H. (1986). Fiscal stress in rural America: Some straws in the wind. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(5), 1188–1193. https://doi.org/10.2307/1241873

Kim, Y., Aldag, A.M., & Warner, M.E. (2020). A balanced view: US local government managers’ perceptions of fiscal stress. Public Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 172–200.

Kiziltan, M., & Yereli, A.B. (2023). Evaluating local fiscal capacity and fiscal effort of Turkish local governments: Evidence from spatial panel data analysis. Economic Change and Restructuring, 56(1), 441–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09424-1

Landreth, H.H. (1961). The measurement of local fiscal capacity. Journal of Finance, 16(1), 105–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1961.tb02803.x

Levine, C.H. (1978). Organizational decline and cutback management. Public Administration Review, 38(4), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.2307/975813

Lubińska, T., Franek, S., & Będzieszak, M. (2007). Potencjał dochodowy samorządu w Polsce. Na tle zmian ustawy o dochodach jednostek samorządu terytorialnego. Difin.

Mackiewicz, M., Malinowska-Misiąg, E., Misiąg, W., & Tomalak, M. (2006). Ramy finansowe Strategii Rozwoju Województw na lata 2007–2013. Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego.

Malinowska-Misiąg, E. (2019). Potencjał dochodowy jednostek samorządu terytorialnego w Polsce. Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.

Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Boex Jameson, L.F. (1997). Fiscal capacity: An overview of concepts and measurements issues and their applicability in the Russian Federation (Working Paper no. 97–3). Georgia State University. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.470821

Ministerstwo Finansów. (2024). Wskaźniki do oceny sytuacji finansowej jednostek samorządu terytorialnego w latach 2019-2023. https://www.gov.pl/web/finanse/wskazniki-do-oceny-sytuacji-finansowej-jst-w-latach-2019---2023

Motek, P. (2024). Tax expenditures w gminach województwa wielkopolskiego. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 72, 341–359. https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2024.72.18

Mullen, J.K. (1990). Property tax exemptions and local fiscal stress. National Tax Journal, 43(4), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788866

Overmans, J.F.A., & Noordegraaf, M. (2014). Managing austerity: Rhetorical and real responses to fiscal stress in local government. Public Money and Management, 34(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2014.887517

Rubin, M.M., & Willoughby, K. (2009). Financial management grades for the states: A prospective use. Public Budgeting and Finance, 29(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2009.00923.x

Shah, A. (2007). Fiscal need equalization: Is it worth doing? Lessons from international practices. In J. Kim & J. Lotz (Eds.), Measuring Local Government Needs – The Copenhagen Workshop 2007. The Korea Institute of Public Finance and the Danish Ministry of Social Welfare.

Stonecash, J., & McAfee, P. (1981). The ambiguities and limits of fiscal strain indicators. Policy Studies Journal, 10(2), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01008.x

Swianiewicz, P. (2011). Finanse samorządowe: koncepcje, realizacja, polityki lokalne. Municipium.

Turley, G., & McNena, S. (2021). Equalisation transfers and local fiscal capacity: A new methodology for Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, 52(1), 53–74.

Walasik, A. (2006). Ekonomiczne i prawne aspekty podziału władztwa podatkowego. Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, 1148, 208–219.

Wang, X., Dennis, L., & Tu, Y.S. (Jeff). (2007). Measuring financial condition: A study of U.S. States. Public Budgeting and Finance, 27(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2007.00872.x

Warner, M.E., Aldag, A.M., & Kim, Y. (2021). Pragmatic municipalism: U.S. local government responses to fiscal stress. Public Administration Review, 81(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13196

Wolman, H. (1983). Understanding local government responses to fiscal pressure: A cross national analysis. Journal of Public Policy, 3(2), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00005936

Wójtowicz, K. (2014). Identyfikacja i pomiar zjawiska stresu fiskalnego w jednostkach samorządu terytorialnego (JST) na przykładzie doświadczeń wybranych miast na prawach powiatu w Polsce w latach 2009–2011. Studia Ekonomiczne, 186(2), 101–110.

Wyszkowska, D., & Wyszkowski, A. (2021). Tax expenditures w podatkach lokalnych w Polsce jako instrument lokalnej polityki podatkowej. Studia Biura Analiz Sejmowych, 1(65), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.31268/StudiaBAS.2021.07

Yilmaz, Y., Hoo, S., Nagowski, M., Rueben, K., & Tannenwald, R. (2006). Measuring Fiscal Disparities Across the U.S. States: A Representative Revenue System/Representative Expenditure System Approach, Fiscal Year 2002. A joint report with the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, NEPPC Working Paper 06-2.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2025.59.3.22-40
Date of publication: 2025-12-16 14:10:21
Date of submission: 2025-02-05 19:35:23


Statistics


Total abstract view - 0
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Monika Banaszewska, Michał Bernardelli, Paweł Felis, Marta Kluzek, Elżbieta Malinowska-Misiąg, Edyta Małecka-Ziembińska, Artur Walasik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.