Agency Theory and Environmental Damage – an Environmental Insurance as an Instrument of Control

Aleksandra Hęćka-Sadowska

Abstract


Theoretical background: Implementing the Environmental Liability Directive (ELD) based on the “polluter pays” principle has increased the legal liability of entities using the environment for the imminent threat of environmental damage and environmental damage caused by their activities. Conclusions of the ELD evaluation assessment and Special Report prepared by the European Court of Auditors revealed several problems confirming a need for continuous monitoring and control of the implemented environmental law, usually performed by the state. Complying with legal requirements in the field of environmental protection is a principal-agent relationship, where based on the implicit social contract, the state (the principal) gives licences to operate and partly delegates the duty to protect the environment to the operator (the agent) and the agent in case of imminent threat of environmental damage or environmental damage is required to, inter alia, take preventive and remedial action.

Purpose of the article: The paper mainly aims to examine, whether and to what extent standalone environmental insurance, also referred to as environmental impairment liability (EIL) insurance, may be used by authority (the principal) as an instrument of control of environmental damage in terms of the ELD caused by operators (the agent).

Research methods: The research methodology involves deductive reasoning and is based on a qualitative analysis of the literature (mainly on agency theory and environmental insurance), the ELD, national reports for Member States from the CEE countries, including ELD cases, industry reports, and documents on the environmental insurance market in the EU-CEE countries, and a comparative analysis of the features of available insurance solutions for environmental damage.

Main findings: The paper’s findings indicate that standalone environmental insurance, which supports the environmental risk management process and provides a cover for liabilities arising under the ELD, may be used to monitor the agency’s activity. However, despite the broader scope of standalone environmental insurance coverage and better alignment with ELD requirements than that of traditional property and casualty insurance, it is not a widely available and commonly used tool in selected CEE countries. A great deal of effort is therefore needed to develop these EIL insurance markets for cooperation between the government and the insurance market in this area.


Keywords


agency theory; environmental damage; environmental insurance; Environmental Liability Directive; the EU-CEE countries

Full Text:

PDF

References


Armour, J., Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2017). Agency problems and legal strategies. In R. Kraakman, J. Armour, P. Davies, L. Enriques, H. Hansmann, G. Hertig, K. Hopt, H. Kanda, M. Pargendler, W.-G. Ringe, & E. Rock (Eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (pp. 29–48). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739630.003.0002

Arrow, K.J. (1984). The economics of agency. Technical Report No. 451, The Economic Series. The Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Bacani, B. (2015). A systemic view of the insurance industry, regulation and sustainable development: International developments and policy proposals for China. In Ch. Zhang, S. Zadek, N. Chen & M. Halle (Eds.), Greening China’s Financial System (pp. 211–242). DRC/IISD with UNEP Inquiry.

Boatright, J.R. (2002). Contractors as stakeholders: Reconciling stakeholder theory with the nexus-of-contracts firm. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(9), 1837–1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00194-2

Bowman, M., & Hunter, D. (1992). Environmental reforms in post-communist Central Europe: From high hopes to hard reality. Michigan Journal of International Law, 13(4), 921–980.

Broderick, J.W., Lavoie, D.R., & Perel, A.J. (2000). Environmental risk management and the role of environmental insurance. Environmental Quality Management, 10(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6483(200023)10:1<3::AID-TQEM2>3.0.CO;2-4

Carmin, J., & Vandeveer, S.D. (2004). Enlarging EU environments: Central and Eastern Europe from transition to accession. Environmental Politics, 13(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010410001685119

Carter, F., & Turnock, D. (Eds.). (2002). Environmental Problems in East-Central Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203449707

Coase, R.H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560

Colonnade. (2019). Kwestionariusz ubezpieczenia środowiskowego environment al protect. https://colonnade.pl/dla-firm/ubezpieczenia-srodowiskowe/odpowiedzialnosc-za-szkody-w-srodowisku

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania. (n.d.). The Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Retrieved February 28, 2025 from https://lrkt.lt/en/about-the-court/legal-information/the-constitution/192

Daly, H.E. (1991). Steady-State Economics. Island Press.

Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage (OJ L 143/56).

Dybdahl, D. (2016, July 1). A big picture on environmental insurance. https://www.irmi.com/articles/expert-commentary/a-big-picture-on-environmental-insurance

EC (European Commission). (n.d.). How EU Member States implement the Environmental Liability Directive. National reports. Retrieved March 1, 2025 from https://environment.ec.europa.eu/law-and-governance/environmental-compliance-assurance/environmental-liability/implementation-member-states_en

EC (European Commission). (2016). Report from the commission to the council and the European Parliament under Article 18(2) of Directive 2004/35/EC on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. (COM(2016) 204 final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal--content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2016:204:FIN

EC (European Commission). (2020). Multi-Annual ELD Rolling Work Programme (MARWP) for the period 2021–2024 “Making the Environmental Liability Directive More Fit For Purpose”. https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2020-11/eld_mawp-approved.pdf

ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2021). Special Report 12/2021. The Polluter Pays Principle: Inconsistent application across EU environmental policies and actions. https://op.europa.eu/webpub/eca/special-reports/polluter-pays-principle-12-2021/en/

Fama, E.F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1086/260866

Fama, E.F., & Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037

Fogleman, V. (2020). Improving financial security in the context of the Environmental Liability Directive No 07.0203/2018/789239/SER/ENV. E.4. European Commission. https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/3b48eff1-b955-423f-9086-0d85ad1c5879/library/ec101025-1121-4809-a1ac-e72a146fd20d/details

Fogleman, V. (2021). Facilitating enforcement of the ELD by competent authorities. (No 07.0203/2020/834494/SER/ENV.E.4 Final report). https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/3b48eff1-b955-423f-9086-0d85ad1c5879/library/9b423999-cc41-41ea-9629-5682e3bb6b2b/details?download=true

Fogleman, V. (2024). Environmental liabilities and insurance law in the European Union. In K. Malinowska & D. Maśniak (Eds.), Managing Environmental Risks through Insurance. Legal and Economic Aspects (pp. 41–92). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47602-0_3

Hęćka-Sadowska, A. (2023). Ubezpieczeniowe metody finansowania realizacji ryzyka środowiskowego przedsiębiorstw w Polsce. Wyd. UE w Poznaniu. https://doi.org/10.18559/978-83-8211-170-5

Hielkema, P. (2023). Climate change insurance needs. VIEWS The EUROFI Magazine, 176. https://www.eurofi.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/views-the-eurofi-magazine_stockholm_april-2023.pdf

Hill, P.J. (1992). Environmental problems under socialism. Cato Journal, 12(2), 321–335.

Holliday, S., Remizova, I., & Stewart, F. (2021). Developing insurance markets: The insurance sector’s contribution to the sustainable development goals (SDGs). World Bank Group. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36353

Insurance Europe. (2017). Compulsory insurance: when it works and when it doesn’t Insight Briefing. https://www.insuranceeurope.eu/publications/470/insight-briefing-compulsory-insurance-when-it-works-and-when-it-doesn-039-t/

Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jerre, U. (2001). Post-Communist Transformation and the Problem of Weak States. Reconceptualizing the Legacy of Communism. (CFE Working Paper Series No. 17). Centre for European Studies at Lund University. http://www.cfe.lu.se/CFEWP/CFEPaper17.pdf

Karaczun, Z.M., & Kassenberg, A. (2019). Environmental transformation in CEE countries. In G. Gorzelak, Social and Economic Development in Central and Eastern Europe: Stability and Change after 1990 (pp. 267–309). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429450969-13

Kivisaari, E., Krischanitz, Ch., Lavelle, D., Martinek, J., & Teguia, C. (2022). Environmental Liability Directive Financial Security and the Polluter Pays Principle. Actuarial Association of Europe. https://actuary.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ELD.pdf

Kurrer, Ch., & Petit, A. (2024). Environment policy: general principles and basic framework. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/71/environment-policy-general-principles-and-basic-framework

Lemkowska, M. (2018). Environmental Liability Directive call for development of financial instruments: the issue of compulsory insurance. Economics and Law, 17(4), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2018.028

Lemkowska, M. (2024). Environmental Insurance Product. In K. Malinowska & D. Maśniak (Eds.), Managing Environmental Risks through Insurance. Legal and Economic Aspects (pp. 253–279). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47602-0_8

Lockton. (2024, August 14). Despite underwriting scrutiny, environmental insurance market remains competitive. https://global.lockton.com/us/en/news-insights/despite-underwriting-scrutiny-environmental-insurance-market-remains

Malinowska, K. (2024). Prevention in Environmental Insurance. In K. Malinowska & D. Maśniak (Eds.), Managing Environmental Risks through Insurance. Legal and Economic Aspects (pp. 281–301). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47602-0_9

Maśniak, D. (2009). Obowiązek ustanowienia zabezpieczenia roszczeń z tytułu szkód w śro¬dowisku jako wyraz interwencjonizmu państwa na rynku ubezpieczeniowym. Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze, XXII, 235–248.

Maśniak, D. (2012). Interes społeczny a przymus w ubezpieczeniach rolnych i ekologicznych. Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze, XXVIII, 217–234.

Misheva, I. (2015). The underwriting process in the environmental pollution liability insurance for enterprises with hazardous waste production. Economic Alternatives, 4, 34–46.

NIK (Najwyższa Izba Kontroli). (2022). Informacja o wynikach kontroli. Działania zapobiegawcze i naprawcze podejmowane w związku z wystąpieniem szkód w środowisku. LLO.430.005.2022. Nr ewid. 9/2023/P/22/071/LLO. https://www.nik.gov.pl/kontrole/wyniki-kontroli-nik/kontrole,23523.html

OECD. (2003). Environmental risks and insurance: A comparative analysis of the role of insurance in the management of environment-related risks. Policy Issues in Insurance, 6. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264105522-en

Pavlínek, P., & Pickles, J. (2000). Environmental Transitions: Transformation and Ecological Defense in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203444924

Pavlínek, P., & Pickles, J. (2004). Environmental pasts/environmental futures in post-socialist Europe, Environmental Politics, 13(1), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010410001685227

Pigou, A. (1932). The Economics of Welfare. Macmillan.

Power, M. (1991). Auditing and environmental expertise: Between protest and professionalisation. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4(3), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579110141751

Pratt, J.W., & Zeckhauser, R.J. (1985). Principals and agents: An overview. In J.W. Pratt & R.J. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business (pp. 1–35). Harvard Business School Press.

President of Romania. (n.d.). The Constitution of Romania. Retrieved February 28, 2025 from https://www.presidency.ro/en/the-constitution-of-romania

Ross, S.A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principals problem. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–139.

Shaukat, A., Tharyan, R., & Trojanowski, G. (2023). Towards the Natural Environment Agency Theory (NEAT). SRRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4519832

Sajó, A. (1997). Universal rights, missionaries, convents and “local savages”. East European Constitutional Review, 6(1), 44–49.

Sejm Library. (n.d.). The Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April, 1997. Retrieved February 28, 2025 from https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm

Sjåfjell, B. (2018). Redefining agency theory to internalize environmental product externalities. A tentative proposal based on life-cycle thinking. In E. Maitre-Ekern, C. Dalhammar, & H.C. Bugge (Eds.), Preventing Environmental Damage from Products: An Analysis of the Policy and Regulatory Framework in Europe (pp. 101–124). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108500128.005

Turnock, D. (2002). The central importance of the European Union. In F. Carter & D. Turnock (Eds.), Environmental Problems in East-Central Europe (pp. 56–91). Routledge.

UNEP FI (United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative). (2022). New risks, new opportunities: Harnessing environmental pollution liability insurance for a sustainable economy. https://www.unepfi.org/industries/insurance/new-risks-new-opportunities-harnessing -environmental-pollution-liability-insurance-for-a-sustainable-economy/

Vari, A., & Tamas, P. (Eds.). (1993). Environment and Democratic Transition. Policy and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8120-2

Wanczeck, S., McCord, M., Wiedmaier-Pfister, M., & Biese, K. (2017). Inclusive insurance and the sustainable development goals. How insurance contributes to 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit. https://us.milliman.com/-/media/milliman/pdfs/2021-articles/5-11-21-inclusive-insurance-and-the-sustainable-development-goals.ashx

WEF (World Economic Forum). (2025). Global Risk Report 2025.https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2025/

Williamson, O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Free Press.

Zingales, L. (2000). In search of new foundations. Journal of Finance, 55(4), 1623–1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00262




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2025.59.4.7-24
Date of publication: 2025-12-16 14:34:36
Date of submission: 2025-03-16 19:19:37


Statistics


Total abstract view - 0
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Aleksandra Hęćka-Sadowska

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.