Emotional Reactions and Coping with Difficult Situations as Indicated by Elementary School Teachers
Abstract
Introduction: In today's school, the changes that are taking place in society are being felt acutely. Nowadays, the number of students with various special educational needs who come to school has increased significantly. There are students with disabilities or children of foreigners who experience long-term burden of (untreated) disease. Teachers face many difficult situations, which involves emotional engagement. They have to make decisions about how to react to the stress they themselves are experiencing. If these ways of reacting allow them to solve the problem, there is an increase in their professional skills. In contrast, focusing on emotions and avoiding problems limits their professional development.
Research Aim: The main objective of the study was to investigate emotions and response strategies to difficult situations, as indicated by elementary school teachers.
Method: The study employed a quantitative strategy, using a diagnostic survey method. The surveyed teachers (100 individuals) were asked to indicate frequently and most frequently experienced emotions and ways they responded to difficult situations (a Likert scale was used here).
Results: The analysis of the results was based on the transactional theory of stress (Lazarus & Folkman). The data obtained show that teachers most often indicated experiencing positive emotions, such as empathy and curiosity. They less often chose emotions indicating a sense of threat or indifference, and only occasionally emotions related to a sense of harm or loss. Respondents indicated that they use problem-solving-oriented strategies in stressful situations, most often in the form of seeking support and cooperation.
Conclusions: The emotions associated with difficult situations at school most often indicated by teachers are positive. They lead to the search for solutions, which supports their professional development. Respondents also point to deficiencies in classroom equipment and salaries. The results of the study are to be used to organize support for teachers to work in diverse inclusive education classrooms.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bjørndal, K.E., Antonsen, Y., Jakhelln, R. (2022). Stress-coping strategies amongst newly qualified primary and lower secondary school teachers with a master’s degree in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Reseatch, 66(7), 1253–1268.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1983647
Camacho, D.A., Vera, E., Scardamalia, K.,Phalen, P.L. (2018). What are urban teachers thinking and feeling? Psychology in the Schools, 55 (9), 1133-1150.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22176
Denek, K. (2009). Edukacja pozalekcyjna i pozaszkolna. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Adama Mickiewicza.Dolenc, P., Virag, Š. (2019). Stres, soočanje s stresom in poklicno zadovoljstvo pedagoških delavcev. Didactica Slovenica - Pedagoska Obzorja, 34, 73 – 85. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6602-2259
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R.S. (1988). Manual for the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/t06501-000
Gajdzica, A. (2013). Portret zbiorowy nauczycieli aktywnych, między zaangażowaniem a oporem wobec zmian. Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
Guerrero, E., Gómez, R., Moreno, J., García-Baamonde, E., Blázquez, M. (2011). Professional burnout syndrome, ways of coping with stress and mental health in university teachers [El síndrome del quemado, modos de afrontamiento del estrés y salud mental en profesores no universitarios]. Behavioral Psychology/Psicologia Conductuabbl, 19(3)557 – 576.
Jagieła, J. (2017). Nauczyciel w koncepcji edukacyjnej analizy transakcyjnej. Studia Paedagogica Ignatiana, 21(2),131 – 154. https://doi.org/10.12775/SPI.2018.2.007
Kwaśnica, R. (2006). Wprowadzenie do myślenia o nauczycielu. W: Z. Kwieciński, B. Śliwerski (Red.). Pedagogika, podręcznik akademicki (s. 291-314). t.2. PWN.
Kwiatkowska, H. (2008). Pedeutologia. Wydawnictwo Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
Laugaa D., Rascle, N. (2008). Stress and burnout among French elementary school teachers: A transactional approach. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 58, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2008.09.007
Lazarus, R. S., Folkman, S. (1984). Stress. Appraisal, and Coping. Springer.
Lazarus, R.S. (1986). Paradygmat stresu i radzenia sobie. Nowiny Psychologiczne, 40-41, pp. 2 – 39.
Ledovskaya, T. V., Solynin, N. E. (2022). Structural and dynamic peculiarities of teacher's coping with stress [Структурно-динамическая специфика совладающего поведения педагога]. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 4 (58), 457-474 https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2022.4.27
Nasser-Abu Alhija’a, F. (2015). Teacher stress and coping: the role of personal and job characteristics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 185, 374 – 380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.415
Oleś, P. (1993). Zagadnienie stresu, kryzysu i radzenia sobie, Roczniki Filozoficzne, XLI(4), 5 – 23.
Pankowska, D. (2010). Nauczyciel w perspektywie analizy transakcyjnej. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej.
Pankowska, D. (2012). Analiza transakcyjna w edukacji czy edukacyjna analiza transakcyjna? – próba porządkowania znaczeń. Edukacyjna Analiza Transakcyjna,1, 13 – 30. https://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media/texts/edukacyjna-analiza-transakcyjna/2012-tom-1/edukacyjna_analiza_transakcyjna-r2012-t1-s13-30.pdf
Sokołowska – Dzioba, T. (2020). Wiedza jako podstawa kompetencji nauczyciela. W: J. Andrzejewska, B. Bilewicz – Kuźnia (Red.) Oblicza edukacji przedszkolnej i szkolnej. (s. 51 – 62). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie Skłodowskiej.
Szempruch, J. (2022). Problemy kształcenia i doskonalenia nauczycieli w Polsce – w kierunku profesjonalizacji zawodu. , Studia Analiz Sejmowych: Szkolnictwo podstawowe i średnie w Polsce, 2(70), 27 – 47. https://doi.org/10.31268/StudiaBAS.2022.11
Szumski, G. (2019). Koncepcja edukacji włączającej. W: I. Chrzanowska, G. Szumski (Red.) Edukacja włączająca w przedszkolu i w szkole (s. 14 – 26). Fundacja Rozwoju Systemu Edukacji.
Wang, H., Lee, S.Y., Hall, N.C. (2022). Coping profiles among teachers: implications for emotions, job satisfaction, burnout, and quitting intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 68, (102030). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102030
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2025.44.4.95-111
Date of publication: 2025-12-29 13:01:13
Date of submission: 2025-04-26 20:16:38
Statistics
Indicators
Copyright (c) 2025

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.