Hide
Show all
Email this article Variation in Language Structure: A View from the Minimalist Program
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Baker, M. (1996). The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford University Press.
Baker, M. (2008). The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (pp. 351–374). John Benjamins.
Berwick, R. C., & Chomsky. N. (2011). The biolinguistic program: The current state of its evolution and development. In A. M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (Eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of human language faculty (pp. 19–41). Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2008). Bare syntax. Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2011). Approaching parameters from below. In A. M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (Eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of human language faculty (pp. 205–221). Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2016). Remarks on logodiversity. In L. Eguren, O. Fernández-Soriano & A. Mendikoetxea (Eds.), Rethinking parameters (pp. 64–104). Oxford University Press.
Bondaruk, A. (2026). Minimalist Program. In H. Nesi & P. Milin (Eds.), International encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 3ed. (Vol. 4, pp. 408–412). Elsevier.
Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris.
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvian Bromberger (pp. 167–217). MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale. A life in language (pp. 1–52). MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond (pp. 104–131). Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2007). Approaching UG from below. In U. Sauerland & H.-M. Gärtner (Eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = Language? (pp. 1–29). De Gruyter.
Chomsky, N. (2021). Minimalism: Where are we now, and where can we hope to go? Gengo Kenkyu (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan), 160, 1–41.
Chomsky, N. (2023). Genuine explanation and the Strong Minimalist Thesis. Cognitive Semantics, 8(3), 347–365.
Chomsky, N. (2024). The miracle creed and SMT. In M. Greco & D. Mocci (Eds.), A Cartesian dream: A geometrical account of syntax, in honour of Andrea Moro (pp. 17–41). Lingbuzz Press.
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford University Press.
Cruschina, S. (2021). The greater the contrast, the greater the potential: On the effects of focus in syntax. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics, 6(1), 1–30.
Cuervo, M. C. (2020). Datives as applicatives. In A. Pineda & J. Mateu (Eds.), Dative constructions in Romance and beyond (pp. 1–39). Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3776531
Den Dikken, M. (1999). On the structural representation of possession and agreement. The case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases. In I. Kenesei (Ed.), Crossing Boundaries: Theoretical Advances in Central and Eastern European Languages (pp. 137–178). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.182.10dik
Haspelmath, M. (2008). Parametric versus functional explanation of syntactic universals. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (pp. 75–108). John Benjamins.
Joseph, B., & Sočanac, T. (2023). Getting serious about serial verbs. In P. Farrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 8(1) (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v8i1.5481
Kövecses, Z. (2017). Conceptual metaphor theory: Some new proposals. LaMiCuS, 1(1), 16–32.
Matthewson, L. (2006). Presuppositions and cross-linguistic variation. In Ch. Davis, A. R. Deal & Y. Zabbal (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (Vol.1, pp. 63–76). University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Newmeyer, F. (2004). Against a parameter-setting approach to typological variation. In P. Pica, J. Rooryck & J. van Craenenbroeck (Eds.), Language variation yearbook (Vol. 4, pp. 181–234). John Benjamins.
Newmeyer, F. (2005). Possible and probable languages. A generative perspective on language typology. Oxford University Press.
Richards, M. (2008). Two kinds of variation in a minimalist system. In F. Heck, G. Müller & J. Trommer (Eds.), Varieties of competition (Linguistiche Arbeits Berichte, 87) (pp. 133–162). Universität Leipzig.
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Foris.
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Kluwer.
Rizzi, L. (2004). Locality and left periphery. In A Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures (Vol. 3, pp. 223–251). Oxford University Press.
Roberts, I. (2019). Parameter hierarchies and Universal Grammar. Oxford University Press.
Roberts, I., & Holmberg, A. (2010). Introduction: parameters in minimalist theory. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation. Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp. 1–57). Cambridge University Press.
Yashima, J. (2015). Antilogophoricity: In conspiracy with the binding theory. [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles] UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5kz3q670
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2026.50.3.1-9
Date of publication: 2026-10-30 11:37:47
Date of submission: 2026-08-02 14:41:04
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Anna Bondaruk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.