Smaki niepokoju: Jedzenie i emocje w Czarnym lustrze

Joanna Łapińska

Streszczenie w języku polskim


Artykuł analizuje funkcje jedzenia w wybranych odcinkach serialu Czarne lustro jako ciała afektywnego i matrycy organizującej emocje, relacje społeczne i struktury władzy. Celem jest pokazanie, jak jedzenie w science fiction może ujawniać mechanizmy władzy i kształtować relacje afektywne. Punktem wyjścia jest teoria afektu Sary Ahmed, która opisuje emocje jako siły krążące między ciałami. Artykuł wykorzystuje także koncepcję „okrutnego optymizmu” Lauren Berlant, wskazując, że jedzenie funkcjonuje jako nośnik niespełnionych obietnic. Analiza odcinków „Piętnaście milionów”, „Na łeb, na szyję” i „Zaraz wracam” pokazuje, że jedzenie – lub jego brak – staje się figurą społecznych norm i emocjonalnej alienacji, wpisując się w badania nad jedzeniem w narracjach science fiction.


Słowa kluczowe


Czarne lustro; afekt; jedzenie jako ciało afektywne; jedzenie w science fiction; okrutny optymizm

Pełny tekst:

PDF (English)

Bibliografia


Ahmed, Sara. (2014). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Artt, Sarah. (2018). ‘An Otherness That Cannot be Sublimated’: Shades of Frankenstein in Penny Dreadful and Black Mirror. Science Fiction Film and Television, 11(2), pp. 257–75. https://doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2018.18

Bennett, Jonathan. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

Berlant, Lauren. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Biasin, Gian-Paolo. (1993). The Flavors of Modernity: Food and the Novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Bowen, Amber. (2022). Barbarism, Boredom, and the Question Concerning Pornography in Fifteen Million Merits. In: Amber Bowen, John A. Dunne (Eds.), Theology and Black Mirror (pp. 35–53). Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Books/Fortress Academic.

Byron, Chris, Brake, Matthew. (2020). Fifteen Million Merits and Fighting Capitalism: How Can We Resist? In: David K. Johnson (Ed.), Black Mirror and Philosophy: Dark Reflections (pp. 20–28). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.

Conley, Donovan, Burroughs, Benjamin. (2019). Black Mirror, Mediated Affect and the Political. Culture, Theory and Critique, 60(2), pp. 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2019.1583116

Conway, Joe. (2019). Currencies of Control: Black Mirror, In Time, and the Monetary Policies of Dystopia. CR: The New Centennial Review, 19(1), pp. 229–253.

Draney, Taylor. (2019). “Stamp[ed] as Commodities”: The Ironic Popular Misinterpretation of “15 Million Merits’” Self-Referential Satire. Essais. An Undergraduate Journal for Literary and Cultural Theory and Criticism, 9(2), pp. 75–97.

Erol, Alkım. (2018). Philosophizing through ‘Nosedive’: Imprisonment by Consent. In: E. Doğan, E. Doğan (Eds.), Current Debates in Media Studies (pp. 195–204). London: IJOPEC Publication Limited.

Forster, Laurel. (2004). Futuristic Foodways: The Metaphorical Meaning of Food in Science Fiction Film. In: Anne Bower (Ed.), Reel Food: Essays on Food and Film (pp. 251–265). London: Routledge.

Giraldo-Luque, Santiago, Carniel Bugs, Ricardo, Tejedor, Santiago. (2021). Nosedive and the “Like” Dystopia: A Reflection on Black Mirror. In: German A. Duarte, Justin M. Battin (Eds.), Reading “Black Mirror”: Insights into Technology and the Post-Media Condition (pp. 165–182). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

Hüsing, Zita. (2020). Black Mirror’s “Fifteen Million Merits”: Re-Defining Human Bodies with Dystopian Technology. Messengers From The Stars: On Science Fiction and Fantasy, (5), pp. 42–56.

Johnson, Mark R. (2019). “Fifteen Million Merits”: Gamification, Spectacle, and Neoliberal Aspiration. In: Terence McSweeney, Stuart Joy (Eds.), Through the Black Mirror: Deconstructing the Side Effects of the Digital Age (pp. 33–42). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kakoudaki, Despina. (2014). Anatomy of a Robot: Literature, Cinema, and the Cultural Work of Artificial People. New Brunswick and London: Rutgers University Press.

Kim, Jin. (2021). Algorithmic Intimacy, Prosthetic Memory, and Gamification in Black Mirror. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 49(2), pp. 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2021.1871584

Klitzing, Anke. (2023). The Literary Gestalt of the Restaurant Review. European Journal of Food Drink and Society, 3(1), pp. 4–28. https://doi.org/10.21427/ZF4H-YX38

Lacerda, Ingrid, Ribeiro de Mattos, Thamires. (2020). Be Right Back: Humans, Artificial Intelligence and Dasein in Black Mirror. Communication, technologies et développement, (8), pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4000/ctd.3353

Lamb, Rebekah, Leidenhag, Joanna. (2022). Be Right Back and the Ethics of Mourning: (In)Authenticity and Resurrection in the Digital Age. In: Amber Bowen, John A. Dunne (Eds.), Theology and Black Mirror (pp. 233–250). Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Books/Fortress Academic.

Lata, Bhatt, Preeti. (2024). Social Media as a Cause of Emotional Distress and Insecurity in “Nosedive” from Black Mirror. Quarterly Review of Film and Video, 41(8), pp. 1520–1535. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208.2023.2219089

Lopes, Juliana. (2018). Is There Any Way Out? Black Mirror as a Critical Dystopia of the Society of the Spectacle. Via Panoramica: Revista de Estudos Anglo-Americanos, 7(2), pp. 85–94.

Mazurek, Marcin. (2021). It’s the End of the World as We See It: A (Post)Apocalyptic Reading of Fifteen Million Merits and Metalhead. In: German A. Duarte, Justin M. Battin (Eds.), Reading “Black Mirror”: Insights into Technology and the Post-Media Condition (pp. 51–67). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

McKenna, Tony. (2019). Behind the Black Mirror: The Limits of Orwellian Dystopia. Critique, 47(2), pp. 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2019.1601887

Niewiadomska-Flis, Urszula. (2022). Race and Repast: Foodscapes in Twentieth-Century Southern Literature. Fayetteville: The University of Arkansas Press.

Novák, Zsófia. (2020). “There’s No Cure for the Internet” – Surveillance, Spectatorship, and Sanctuary in Black Mirror. FOCUS: Papers in English Literary and Cultural Studies, 12(1), pp. 115–131. https://doi.org/10.15170/Focus/12.2020.8.115-131

Pagnoni Berns, Fernando Gabriel. (2018). Spectacular Tech-Nightmare: Broadcasting Guy Debord. In: Angela M. Cirucci, Barry Vacker (Eds.), Black Mirror and Critical Media Theory (pp. 115–125). Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Books.

Radovanović, Bojana. (2018). Reality on the Screen: The Subject of the Dystopian Future/Present. Thoughts on episode “Fifteen Million Merits” of Black Mirror. AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, (17), pp. 103−112. https://doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i17.275

Redmond, Sean. (2019). The Planned Obsolescence of “Nosedive”. In: Terence McSweeney, Stewart Joy (Eds.), Through the Black Mirror: Deconstructing the Side Effects of the Digital Age (pp. 111–123). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Retzinger, Jean P. (2008). Speculative Visions and Imaginary Meals: Food and the Environment in (Post-Apocalyptic) Science Fiction Films. Cultural Studies, 22(3–4), pp. 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380802012500

Richards, Bradley. (2020). Be Right Back and Rejecting Tragedy: Would You Bring Back Your Deceased Loved One? In: David K. Johnson (Ed.), Black Mirror and Philosophy: Dark Reflections (pp. 41–49). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.

Rizza, Alfredo. (2021). The ‘Death of Neighbour’ Seen in a Black Mirror – (Be Right Back on Solaris). In: German A. Duarte, Justin M. Battin (Eds.), Reading “Black Mirror”: Insights into Technology and the Post-Media Condition (pp. 257–276). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

Schopp, Andrew. (2019). Making Room for Our Personal Posthuman Prisons: Black Mirror’s “Be Right Back”. In: Terence McSweeney, Stewart Joy (Eds.), Through the Black Mirror: Deconstructing the Side Effects of the Digital Age (pp. 57–67). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Serdar, Meryem. (2023). Transformation of the Surveillance Society from Panopticon to Omnipticon: The Case of Black Mirror’s Episode ‘Nosedive’. OPUS – Journal of Society Research, 20(53), pp. 398–411. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1253893

Tüzün, Hatice Övgü. (2021). Mediated Subjectivities in Postemotional Society: Black Mirror’s Nosedive. In: German A. Duarte, Justin M. Battin (Eds.), Reading “Black Mirror”: Insights into Technology and the Post-Media Condition (pp. 149–164). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.

Urueña, Sergio, Melikyan, Nonna. (2020). Nosedive and the Anxieties of Social Media: Is the Future Already Here? In: David K. Johnson (Ed.), Black Mirror and Philosophy: Dark Reflections (pp. 83–91). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.

Urzúa Opaza, Macarena, Faure, Antoine. (2018). The Dystopia of the Spectator: Past Revival and Acceleration of Time in Black Mirror (“The Entire History of You” and “Be Right Back”). In: Angela M. Cirucci, Barry Vacker (Eds.), Black Mirror and Critical Media Theory (pp. 235–245). Lanham, Boulder, New York and London: Lexington Books.

Watters, Siobhan. (2022). “My Food is Not That of Man”: Food as Posthuman Phenomenon. In: Robin Hammerman (ed.), Frankenstein and STEAM: Essays for Charles E. Robinson (pp. 64–83). Newark: University of Delaware Press.

Yazdizadeh, Abdolali. (2019). In and Out of the Black Mirror. An Ideological Investigation into ‘Nosedive’. Limina, 25(1), pp. 16–28.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/ff.2025.43.2.217-230
Data publikacji: 2025-12-29 09:26:22
Data złożenia artykułu: 2025-06-25 17:02:44


Statystyki


Widoczność abstraktów - 0
Pobrania artykułów (od 2020-06-17) - PDF (English) - 0

Wskaźniki



Odwołania zewnętrzne

  • Brak odwołań zewnętrznych


Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Joanna Łapińska

Creative Commons License
Powyższa praca jest udostępniana na lcencji Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.